11 November 2011

Holy Trinity of Social Media Making - Actors vs. Concepts

Yesterday I went to check how the N2 social media hub is heating up after summer. Here few reflections of the hour and a half session of SoMe buzzing.

The hub started as always: you get there and find yourself in a middle of big room with only 10 anxious people in it. Then, sharply 2 minutes to five people rush to the event and soon it's too hot and heavy to breath. As one the fellows noted, people are in "the meeting manuscript mode" such like you get to the meeting, you attend the meeting and then you leave the meeting minding your other business. Yep, feel guilty!

Anyhow once again, the repertoire was entertaining and nicely bundled around one theme to which different actors bring insights. Yesterday, the focus was on what are the contributions of the holy trinity - media, advertising and digital agencies- to good SoMe marketing. 

From the very start the audience got best laughs of the simplifications over where digital advertising is at the moment: "Like us and win ..." is the easy option over challenging the customers' imagination. This is to say, firms are still buying customers rather than building a relationship which arises the dull question of what are the prospects of good marketing performance (awareness, differentiation, loyalty, phenomenal media coverage) when 50 other firms are using "the win the iPad 2" ?

Self-critical discussion also took off around the frames (budget and planning) within which SoMe monitoring and customer listening can actually succeed to impact marketing outcomes. In this sense, what are the possibilities to create ADHOC campaigns when treasury holder doesn't allow it as it's not planned?  Reactions, such like gin in a tin first aid transportation from Helsinki to Brighton as captured in Lonkero for People campaign from Hartwall last month, are not going happen too often as somebody rationalized. 




This is how the 2 week's first aid campaign started. What I would have wanted to see in the campaign pages was hooray for media coverage across countries - did it get any?


Continuing with the budget aspect further, heading off with this kind of reactive campaign is risky - what if it doesn't succeed? In this sense, budget must be flexible between both ends which holds that 'kill your darlings' is rather quick decision to avoid any further expenses. 

All of this (delivering triggering marketing content & social mechanics) finally comes to listening and understanding the customer. Today companies, projects and jobs are atomized to complex networks - often times the knowledge disappears in the chain. The company is orchestrating different agencies to deliver successful (SoMe) marketing for multiple brands: media buying, advertising design and finally those who actually build them together as the deliverable outocome. Agencies, on the other hand, are balancing between the threat of hyperspecialization and collaboration with competitors while dreaming of becoming a full house solutions partner. Orchestrating then again implies that the firm must hold the helicopter view of how different projects tune in the marketing strategy. 

Unfortunately, from industrial echoes organizations are still functioning through silos. In his sense, one might ask who is responsible for social media monitoring and how? If lucky, it's designated to one person or diced to one unit within a silo or even across silos. Not so good options could be that it's outsourced or it doesn't exist at all. Whatever the chosen option, the questions are: Do the people have listening skills? How the  information is moving across silos and different projects?

Often times the holy trinity of social media are though over channels where to be (Facebook/Twitter/Blogs) or what different concepts are involved in social media (technology/content/customers). For the firm though, it seems to be the mastering the different partners and actors involved doing it.

As for attending these small scale hubs and breakfast sessions, I highly recommend them as above all the presentations initiate good remarks and discussions in situ that are not present in the slides provided afterwords. Finnish networking then again... we can only for so long take lame excuses that it's a week day.

16 May 2011

Hooray for Pitches!

If anything MBL has been a pitch school. Pitching to lecturers, partners, strangers and friends. Learning from my own mistakes and from others'. I used to think that business school is a secure way of learning how to be in front of people and present whatever. This is true in a sense that during almost every course I've been doing just that. But this has nothing to do with pitching.




Pitching is about yourself. It's about making an impact, selling yourself and your ideas to different people and groups.  Polishing what is the best of you that you can offer as well as crystallizing what you believe in and envision. And believe me, there's no easy way of doing it other than having the drive to do it again and again. Ideas are just ideas and thoughts are nothing without action. And pitching is a never-ending process of YOU in action in oppose to just presenting.

When you have it all figured out for the VCs (what David Rose is talking about here) it comes down to the very last minute before standing in front of the audience. As a note to myself of all the sessions and great speakers from the past spring, I want to share few thoughts on that specific moment.

  • Remembering that audience likes movement rather than stick figures, the secret of strong voice and confident posture does not build from drawn back military shoulders but core stomach muscles. This gives a relaxed way of being and moving on stage. 
  • You're not presenting to get people to like you but to get them inspired of your idea. Pitching is not about winning the audience but communicating with them.
  • Listening is like a journey during which people think heaps of things: bills, taking the dog out, mails that they forgot to reply to, grocery shopping etc. But most importantly something that you said reminded them of something to which they can relate to. Do not get offended of the funny and negative faces in the audience that derive from this journey.
  • Think about all the mean questions beforehand so that you're prepared to counterarguments.
  • And at the very last minute when you think that you just can't do it remember the King's Speech even though you don't stammer.

So yeah, hooray for the pitches and enjoy! MBL teams will be presenting and pitching new service concepts in Masters of Arts Festival in Salmisaari this Wednesday. See you there!

31 March 2011

Measuring Social Media

I wouldn't have missed yesterday's N2 social media hub for anything. Hot topic of the day was measuring social media to which I have been eagerly focusing the past two years. As a  business it's new and evolving, but in everyday life an area where marketer needs to know one's stuff. Experts giving insights over the subject included Jari Jaanto representing both IRC-Galleria and IAB Finland, CEO Tommi Lehtonen from Whitevector & Digital Marketing Manager Jussi-Pekka Erkkola from Nokia.


When it comes to marketing and social media, the leading question is whether you can measure ROI for your campaign. Can traditional thinking of reach, frequency and return on investment work fully in the complex net of attitudes, motivations, associations, relationships, feelings and behavior? All of the speakers gave supporting answers but noted that it really depends on the product and whether its consumers are in social media. There is no winning formula that fits all but rather the success in social media should always be compared to firm's own business goals and past performance. What is our goal in raising awareness, discussion and sharing? Are we stimulating the viewers or engaging participants? What are our long term social media goals and how are they integrated to overall marketing strategy?


Another challenge with social media, in addition to accountability, is that there are so many metrics to choose from yet only some of them fit the specific needs of the firm, campaign or the uniqueness of one social medium. The time span is also important as usually campaigns and trends follow the long tail. The beauty of social media monitoring, however, is that you can follow the phases and act upon them. Even though consistency is the key in both monitoring and measuring, the ultimate advantage is that you act upon it whether it's customer support, brand management, changing your campaign core theme or observing weak signals. And acting requires understanding the qualitative side behind the numbers.  


Ultimately you're not measuring social media per se but your customers behaving and socializing within it. We all can jump around for skyrocketing sums of consumer responses but rarely have time to explore what explains the change and what does it mean for our strategy. Thus in addition to money talk, successful social media marketing should be measured also in terms of consumer behavior as Hoffman and Fodor point out. Social media marketing should aim to satisfy customers' needs to connect, create, consume and control. And in measuring marketers ought to know how to read the numbers behavior wise.


Overall the evening gave good insights from different angles from practical customer approach to the one of monitoring tool provider and finally to measurement standard development in the field. Let's stay tuned!


Finnish readers pls check the presentations here.

26 February 2011

How to Understand Social Media?

Last time I wrote about social media's status in marketing strategies, I stated that companies sort of know where to go but what and how are still obscure. The major social media channels are well known whilst gaining visibility and interaction are the challenge. Firms are desperate to find ways how to benefit from their communities across social media.  

There is no general way how to categorize social media. To me, social media are the people who share personal views and media content. On the next level, defition of online community doesn't equal the platform used but is made up from communications across activitites in various platforms. This definition is rather ubiquitous and abstract, and isn't enough alone. In the other end is a functional categorization by e.g. Kaplan and Haenlein (2009 ) who divide social media into six types:  collaborative projects, blogs, content communities, social networking sites, virtual game worlds and virtual social worlds by comparing provided possibilities of self-presentation and social presence in a specific medium. Just place the word 'social' in front of news, videos aka Youtube and photos aka Flickr etc. Whereas understanding the purposes and functions of different platfroms is essential for a marketer to choose and use one, it says little about the meaning of the community i.e. the ultimate target firms want to interact with. 

So what are the effective means to reach communities in social media? Firstly, social media must be a part of the firm's promotion strategy and in line with other marketing actions, which Mangold and Faulds (2009) also emphasize. Integration is the key. This really is a problem, because firms are affraid of the fact that they can't control what happens in the virtual grapevine.  Thus in general they don't fully consider social media's possibilities and the meaning to their business. This results just in actions of presence in stead of idea of serving superior value to consumers.

Often times social media are sold to managers with the idea of it being so cheap. Wrong, social media are all around and choosing the best channels just for your business is crucial to focus your marketing resources as being social is everyday task. Being active is the key. This is also question of who is willing and has the know-how to socialize in the name of the brand. As noted earlier my post, in many cases the brand is taking a backseat when the intreaction within social media is personalized to the person representing the company as well. Being social and interacting with consumers also translates to consumer knowledge and openness. You must have a hunch what consumers and communities would like to hear and do whilts communicating it with common sense. Thus being interesting is the key to drive discussion and virality.

Mangold and Faulds (2009) have really good examples in their article how this is done in practice, check them out. Though, examples are dangerous in two ways: one size doesn't fit all and secondly somebody has already done it i.e. saturation. Nevertheless,  I'm going summarize main points of the exmaples. To begin with, there is no separation between online and real life consumer as the goal of any marketing activity is to drive sales. Thus, limiting or focusing all networking opportunites of like-minded individuals to social media is not necessary as the first rule of integration implies. Brand networking events that take place face-to-face are likely to strenhten and prosper community relationships that will continue also online. Providing incentives, such as contests, is a traditional way of integrating consumption activities and company/brand attachment online. Leveling up the experience to community is easilly done by including voting logic. At the moment gamification is the THING to consider, how you could engage and entertaing your consumers.  And last but least, linking to fans' blogs in company homepage is worth of considering, too. Laissez-faire attitude isn't enough in social media and enthroning examples of innovative fan stories etc. in various ways is important way of socializing in social media.


Check what academics are saying:
Kaplan A.M. and Haenlein M. (2009) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Kelley School of Business, Indiana University.
Mangold G.W. and Faulds D.J. (2009) Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Kelley School of Business, Indiana University.

17 February 2011

Social Casual Gaming - What an Hilarious Misunderstanding

Series of clicking, stages, badges and helping co-players. A casual routine shared with friends. Entertainment. This is what more or less 40% of people use Facebook for. This is social casual gaming.


Tiina Zilliacus from Ironstar Helsinki  gave an introduction to social casual gaming industry in previous  N2's Social Media Hub, the new monthly arena for media professionals to discuss current topics and to mingle around.  The themes also covered content marketing รก la Vapa Media and the rationale of CRM - or Romantic CRM - in marketing served by Kari Tervonen from N2. To me and based on the amount of questions for others as well, Zilliacus' presentation really blew up the bank. 


MUAHAHAHHAHA! They are not REAL games! AHAHAHAHAA! Middle aged women and their game logic! Who would REALLY play Facebook games? But then again, we all have our odd habits. Usually they're hidden from friends but social games are quite the opposite when every task you make is posted on your wall. It's as okay to build a virtual farm or a bar in Facebook as it is to smash egg snatching pigs on a bus ride home. Social casual gaming seems to be an hilarious misunderstanding for the trendy ad people and hard core players. 

The numbers are serious business, though. According to AppData, at the moment the top three social games include CityVille, FarmVille and Texas HoldEm all by Zynga. CityVille, which was launched last December, has 96,153,837 monthly active users (MAU) whereas FarmVille still goes strong with half from that. That's loads of city cash or farm bucks.  

Thank God the customers are rational grown-up people! Pleaded Zilliacus when compared their game to HABBO which has been popular among youngsters and teens almost a decade. Surely the popularity of social gaming makes you re-think how to benefit from game dynamics and elements in your marketing, but there is no point to overlook teenagers' creativity. All the arenas in HABBO are user-generated and goods have a secondary market. That is more than clicking. However, as a new segment of players arises from Facebook users, also HABBO is ensuring it's new player acquisition with a Facebook app. 


Winds of change are blowing also in this new game business as developers have their own game going on with Facebook which is making Facebook credits a mandatory currency from the beginning of July 2011. Is it an inspiration or a headache?

16 February 2011

Behind The Scenes of Animation

My favorite animations since childhood have been Who Framed Roger RabbitThe Night Before Christmas and the good old Molletje. And now that I'm browsing IMDb's list, memories full my mind of escapes to the theater. First one ever was Aladdin with my big sister. Then, somehow, the parts changed and I became the cool auntie taking her kids to the movies. The Incredibles, Ratatouille, Wallace & Gromit in The Curse of the Were-Rabbit, Wall-E, Toy Stories and yes even Alvin and the Chipmunks. Ultimately, it is the story that satisfies the viewer's thirst for miracles but undoubtedly animation still takes my inner child to higher levels.

To find out how animations actually come alive before we hit the theaters, me and my fellows popped in to Anima, a Finnish animation production companyAnima is well present in Finnish TV: political satire Itsevaltiaat and sitcom Pasila probably ring a bell to most readers along with many commercials upon which Anima Boutique has had their hands on






However, the specific reason why we wanted to visit Anima was the amaze over how an award-winning 3D movie Niko and The Way to the Stars, which was sold over 120 countries, arised from a small Finnish company. In discussions with Production Manager Sini Lindberg, we went through issues from business to production along with specific techniques used, all in all get the idea what does it take to make animation movie. And let me tell ya - a lot.

The animation industry is highly competitive. No need to emphasize the freedom that stock exchanged studios, like Disney owned Pixar and DreamWorks which goal is to release two movies per year, have compared to  entrepreneurs. However, this doesn't mean that you can't compete with the big fishes. To achieve the quality set by the West, you just need to join forces on a broader level. 


Niko and The Way to the Stars was Anima's second 3D movie and naturally European level co-production with A.Film, Magma Films and alike. When compared to an in-house production, the creation of funding and production networks takes more time. And obviously, when the distribution of production is scattered all around Europe, the risks of errors increases the amount of iterations. Rendering doesn't turn out the way it's supposed to.  To notice that the snowball, which your figure was supposed to throw is missing actually starts a snowball effect to correct the error. Thus to succeed in complex co-production you need to have  spot-on management.




www.nikomovie.com



As usually in the movie business, sequels are the rule rather than exception. In animation, however, this has many advantages. In stead of the full process of modeling, designing and surfacing figures, the main characters are already existing and ready to be remolded to your imagination. In the limits of new script, you can probably re-use also some of the sets. All this enables faster overlapping production processes. To what extent this is benefited can be seen if Niko's next adventure is released.


It would have been interesting ponder upon how the marketing approaches used differ for a small production company/co-production and across different target markets.  Movie and TV business in general is the playground for transmedia storytelling and how this was used in Niko's case was out of our time available. But definitely something I'm going to look into if and when the sequel is coming up.

5 February 2011

Branding Finland

Finnish companies have been bashed over marketing skills for ages. And just on our flight back home from Amsterdam was I yet again reminded of this subject thanks to Monocle's latest issue (issue 39. vol 04). In its soft power survey, which concentrates on soft diplomacy and branding cultural icons, Finland ranked 9th after our Scandinavian counterparts Sweden (6th) and Denmark (7th). The fix summary concluded that even though Finland is notable for its design heritage, we could export our gems far more effectively.


Yes, we are design lovers. Needless to say that Aalto University carries the legacy of beloved Alvar Aalto and is on its journey of combining the state of art of design, business and technology. And taking it to another level by joining forces internationally with Aalto Tongji Design Factory. Not only on institutional and national level, we also have witnessed genius masterstrokes by individuals such as HEL YES! temporary 'pop-up' restaurant which operated in London last autumn. 




HEL YES! Check Esquire's review here.


Marketing is topical subject now as the design field is buzzing: Turku is the European Capital of Culture this year where Helsinki takes off as World's Design capital 2012 the following year. At the moment our marketing strategy seems to be exporting by importing tourists and visitors. This brings great opportunities to show the uniqueness of our country in the ethos of soft diplomacy.


So what kind of brand is Finland? Design, nature and technology driven no doubt. But what does this really mean? In stead of spoiling the fun by summarizing The Monocle Finland Survey 2010/11 included in the volume, I'm just going to link three examples to illustrate where we are coming from:



'What you see is what you get. We are a no-bullshit country.'

Alexander Stubb, Minister of Foreign Affairs, when asked how would he describe the Finnish mentality. More interesting opinions in his blog. And BTW, Finland spends 3.8% of its GDP on research and development - the second highest amount in the world.


'It's difficult for them because there aren't many 'real' jobs. But the young generation is incredibly enterprising and are starting projects spanning many different industries. There's a great sense of 'doing'.'


Comtemporary designer Harri Koskinen on how hard it is for young Finnish designers today.


'Finland is home. But it's always nice to get away once a year.'


Santa Clause, Logistics Expert, about his thoughts of homeland. Another example of black humor worthwhile to check is Rare Exports by Jalmari Helander, which also was in the top 3 of new Finnish movies.




From Finland with Love,


Saara

22 January 2011

Amsterdam We Salut You!

Once upon a time (read 4.30 AM), group of media students packed their their bags and took off to Amsterdam. Not often do you have this kind of chance to get on a sponsored excursion to media agencies and Universities to mingle with inspiring professionals. Indeed, one huge benefit of the European education system is that the social distance between companies and students is small giving the chance to combine your academic background to real life experience and examples.

Visiting our industry partners', Sanoma and OMD, branch offices not only gave insights what the following year is going to be online publishing and consulting wise, but also showed how different the target groups are despite common challenges. For example, the Dutch prefer Twitter in oppose to Facebook in everyday socializing. The slow rise of Facebook can be explained by their own local competitor, Hyves, whereas in Finland the Facebook skyrocketed. Also, the Dutch are more active mobile users in comparison to Finns. This, how people use smartphones in their everyday life, is something I personally have to dig in to.

For our media service idea, the trip was perfect kick-off. We had exiting brainstorming session in Medialab which clarified our team's focus and gave good frame of reference to reflect on. Also, the PROJEKTENMARKT fair held by Utrecht  School of Arts was interesting game benchmarking wise. Especially the Jelly Reef was fun! The initial project cases were given from the business industry upon which the students started to build up their ideas. The amount of teams was overwhelming :)

Amsterdam is beautiful and fun city! In addition to strolling the streets and markets we crashed the restaurant scene with full army. Mussels, oysters, chips with mayo, cheese, cheese and cheese! However, ultimately it's the people that make or break the experience: the speakers and presenters, teachers and co-students. Thanks all!

15 December 2010

Innovation - is it a figure?

To develop ideas, you need to be able to look at the same information everyone else does, and then organize it into a new and different pattern,  states Michalko in Thinkertoys. A Handbook of Business Creativity for the 90s. (1991). This has two important 'to be ables'. Firstly, to look at the same information that everyone else is watching. Secondly, to have motivation to organize it in a new way. 

I'm more of the first. From childhood I've been an observer and my mind free flows to different conclusions easily. Roughly put, I'm very good at analyzing information. The latter part of innovation, on the other hand, requires motivation to structure the new pattern more profoundly, i.e. by devoting to research and overcoming your own demons of questioning what is new and different. Processing the new as usually the first conclusions are just a hint of what is about to come.

This dualism pretty much defines also the MBL program. The first half we've been observing everyone else by doing netnography, analyzing and benchmarking. During this past fall, we've been also working with creativity, innovation, clarification and planning methods and tools to come up with hundreds of ideas in the MBL Creativity Workshops given by Piritta Kantojรคrvi from Grape People

Undoubtedly, more than ever we'll need these creativity tools next spring when we're all fail-fast in structuring our ideas to something new. As if anything, innovation is a process.

The media service ideas will be pitched the 16th of December (tomorrow!) for further business planning and mock-ups.

14 December 2010

Future of Advertising Film

Traditionally advertising film has been the crown jewel of all advertising mainly thanks to TV's predominant role in people's lives. We all love to bash for and against the ad films. Sometimes, I even talk to the voice over out of annoyance when heading to the fridge whilst the commercial break.

But now due to digitalization the film is facing some serious challenges: web is becoming the number one channel, cost pressure affects production and the life cycle is becoming ever shorter. From advertiser's perspective, the change is not just adding the clip online or providing longer, more entertaining version of the brand story. It could be something like this.






Or like this.






Or even something like this, Area's Krisse B2B targeted campaign which was awarded couple of times last spring's Grand One digital marketing competitionIs the advertising film remediating? Or is the banner advertisement using more narratives and  becoming more interactive?

Few weeks ago, Sami Kankkunen from OMD also talked about the emergence of interactive banners at the Impacting the Bottom Line with Media Services seminar. People are witty  in avoiding the ad banners, but interactive ad clips are more pervasive in nature. Thus they are more efficient and hopefully more enjoyable and entertaining, too.

During the discussion over my own class presentation at Aalto roused two important notions concerning the future of ad film. Firstly, there's nothing more annoying than psychedelic sounds out of nowhere when checking e.g. news site. Thus the activation of ad film should be under freedom of choice to some extent. On the other hand, people have accepted that the free online content and advertisement walk hand in hand. Secondly, interface development (read iPad) is a huge opportunity to educate consumers to this kind of advertising. Who could deny that watching these interactive clips is part of the user experience and half of the fun?

Thanks again for the great speakers at the seminar and all of those who came to say hello during the poster sessions!

3 November 2010

The Imperative of Social Media Marketing


Come down from you tower and realize the facts.  Social media is not a top-down channel but customer-driven. But don’t get too cozy either and think you can just survive by monitoring the online talk from your chair. Social media is also interactive and to engage your customers you need to be pro-active, too.


So get involved is still the chant of social media buzz. However, the discussion of social media marketing in general is medium driven in many ways. Everybody recognizes the top 3 biggest social media channels, but wonder which one of them is effective just for their business. Thus companies sort know where to go but what and how are still obscure.

In the heat of social media few years back, companies started blogs many of which now  have died out due to lack of participation from both parties. Oops, online brand awareness was more complicated than expected and building up customer relationship wasn’t that easy of a task after all, wasn’t it? If customers don’t accept the message the company is sending, the result does not fall far from traditional advertizing: no action, no community. The level of participation from a firm cannot be just news feeds but also providing real customer value.

Another cruel example of poor judgment comes from attitudes to crisis management. In the social media, companies need to have a clear strategy for mitigating any disasters—and preferably to prevent them from occurring in the first place. Finns know the urban legend of restaurant Lehtovaara. People talk about your business even though you’re not, and you need to participate in the discussion whether you like it or not. Whether a compliment or  a complaint, to show consumers that you’re listening and reacting can create loyalty.

Jessica Tsai also highlights the importance of relationships in her article Everyone’s Social (Already) (Customer Relationship Management, June 2009). Social media is foremost facilitating relationships and connecting people. These relationships stem from mutual interest and mutual gain, which also are powerful tools for customer loyalty. In mobilizing your customers to become your heralds is the fact that social media marketing is networking.


What does it take to get involved?
In practical level, another problem businesses face with social media is that they don’t have a strategy. But like any business decision, participating in social media requires a plan and a purpose. As Tsai acknowledges in the article, social media strategy requires operational, technological, and customer service resources—all of which extend beyond the marketer’s control. On the other end of the strategy, considerations of how social media will affect the company itself (brand-building, product development, marketing communication and advertising) ought to be analyzed, too.

Interesting prospect presented in the article was the growing role of company representatives. The brand is taking a backseat to the person representing the company. Social media is about people and personalization of content in both sides of the medium. This if anything stresses that social media is not some channel or crowd separated from the business; rather it’s the people representing the brand and the company. 

A common slant over getting involved is also the question of cost efficiency ratio. Whereas enterprises may have the resources to invest on research and social media experiment, small businesses can do only so much. However, as Jeremy Farber states in the article, social media provides a platform that can be just as effective. It requires knowledge of the mediums, the communities as well as best practices of communication in online environment. To me, succeeding in social media marketing is more dependent on the level of expertise in these areas rather than the size of the company and especially the content provided. Also, encouraging point raised in the article was that social networks themselves are struggling to establish revenue models, thus providing an opportune time for businesses to take advantage.

Warming up the conversation
Getting involved also means change in attitude. The confidence customers’ require demand authenticity and transparency from the companies they transact with. Many customers now feel entitled to talk to the brand - a phenomenon that Tsai predicts to only intensify as Millennials take over the market. 

Is there an art to channeling conversation into a meaningful activity for marketers? According to Adam Sarner, research director at Gartner, community members want freedom but they don’t mind ground rules. ‘If you’re all over the place, they don’t know why they’re there.’ stating that crowds need direction. ‘Tell them what you’re looking for and how they can benefit to create a sense of what’, this is what Sarner calls mutual purpose.

So what then? We have the purpose and the community, but do we really know who our customers are? David Dalka, independent marketing consultant, states that ‘social media still a giant blob of data not connected to individuals.’ Self-identity is required to know the customer. Tsai notes, that soon consumers will have a single online identity, such as OpenID. I, too, believe that in the future the ecommerce platforms and social mediums are brought to closer integration and co-operation e.g. in terms of user login and the overall purchasing process. But that future is still far ahead due to user identity development and security issues.

The reality
Let’s reflect how companies are performing social media marketing wise at the moment. Twitter, Facebook and Youtube are taken over by the 100 largest companies in Fortune 500 according to Burson-Marsteller, the first  being the most popular platform. Two-thirds of the Fortune 100 have at least one Twitter account and on average 4.2 Twitter accounts. Social networks like Twitter and Facebook are mostly West-oriented; Asia-Pacific companies don’t use them as much, instead preferring corporate blogs. 43% of Facebook fan pages had posts from fans. In fact, some of the pages were primarily set up for customers to post comments and questions to receive responses from the company.

However, a recent survey conducted on British small-to-medium sized companies (SMEs) gives some insight to the overall attitudes and the astray to social media. According to Forum of Private Business, where 52%of SMEs use social media, only 27% of respondents saw popular networking sites beneficial. Surprisingly, 21% described them as ‘not useful' and 6% labeled them ‘useless'. Only 7% respondents who use social media described it as ‘very useful' for their businesses.

Don’t lose your hope yet; it’s not about the size as noted earlier. In fact, young SMEs are spending more of their advertizing money online and have more aggressive social media strategies according to NetNewsCheck. Young SMEs are spending nearly three times as much of their marketing budget online as the older companies and want their money to be spent on iPad apps, reputation management, search engine optimization (SEO) and other new forms of marketing.

When it comes to social media strategy, 43 % of US companies with 500 or fewer employees report that their marketing department handles social networking outreach, followed by public relations (26%) and human resources (19%). Usually employers have 1-3 people communicating on behalf of their organization in social media, whilst 7 % report that 4-5 individuals and 11% more than 6 individuals to manage the communication.  Not surprisingly, 57% stated that they didn’t know.

How about the efficiency? According to Social Influence Benchmark Report by StrongMail , email proved to be the most popular method of sharing content, with 86% of the companies using that as their preferred sharing method. However, the percentage of information to go viral was much higher on non-email channels. Only 41% of email was re-shared whereas in Twitter the content was re-shared 1837% of the time. Also, personal links (i.e. embedded links for blogs) were more viral than Facebook. On the other hand, emails resulted in approximately 16% more clicks (e.g. purchases, sign-ups) than blogs and badges.

From these results it’s obvious that building presence in social media channels requires more than just company/product profile. More strategic and cross-media approach need to be taken to build the relationship and dialogue with consumers. As for the SMEs, the confusion that traditional SMEs are experiencing may be form the fact that they don’t know how to use the platforms; they don’t have Doers to advantage the new marketing channels. 

Conclusions
Whether companies like it or not, social media is impacting business. Not only the marketing functions and product development but attitudes, too. The follow-up and dialogue with consumers not only reinforces customer service but helps the company better understand the life of its product. More importantly, the focus should be in the future. To catch and assure purchase intents is more relevant than emphasizing past transactions.

However, it must be clear that social media cannot be ignored. Not every channel work for every business and thus early adoption is crucial. Getting involved in social media is more than presence and building brand awareness, and more importantly is creating value and being alert. Social media is changing and evolving all the time which highlights the need to participate in this co-creation. The sooner you jump in, the better you get.


Source: Tsai, J. (2009). Everyone’s Social (Already). Customer Relationship Management, June 2009, 34-38.

Consumer Chameleon


Reflecting vaguely Simmons’ Marketing to postmodern consumers: introducing internet chameleon (European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42 pp. 299-310, 2008). As the headline of the study suggests, Simmons provides an introduction of Internet as changing marketing tool. He approaches the subject from brand consumption's point of view. He sees that Internet is a marketing tool that reconciles the tension between individualism and social brand consumption.
Marketers are challenged by the ever fragmenting markets that are dispersing to smaller and smaller segments. In addition to the worry over coming across masses, is the need to win over that one consumer, too. Postmodernity in consumption can also be seen as fragmentation of experience consisting of a series of interrelated ideas, preferences and representations of selves. Thus the self is essentially decentred. Fragmentation is along side with shallow realm the two positions representing postmodern consumer.  

Postmodern consumer – a puzzle
Simmons notes that much of the media (television, music and film) increasingly resemble each other, presenting collages of fleeting moments that excite senses yet rarely connect to a central theme or focus. He further states that these collages of fleeting moments fit to postmodern consumers’ loss of commitment to any single lifestyle or belief system. This kind of detachment promotes their identity jigsaw consisting of various representations of selves even when approaching same product category.

The second position defining the postmodern consumer is the world they live in: superficial and shallow reality, a world mediated by simulation and hyper-real experiences. Postmodern culture has created a partly disinterested nostalgia but also prestalgia, the longing the moments already in advance. The representation of an imagined past or future in the present, focuses postmodern consumption on the ‘right here, right now’. Consumers’ perception of time of is fragmented as they experience themes, tastes, sounds from the past and the future in the perpetual present until they move to the next exciting experience.

These fleeting moments and the concept of time dimensions come down to attention. Consumers are drowning in information and marketing messages for which attention has become most scarce resource of information economy.  You can’t store attention for future use, you can’t allocate it nor can you measure it properly. But can you predict it? What drives consumer's attention? The answer is obvious: me, myself and I.

Brand consumption
In attention economy, intellectual property, arts and letters, virtual text are the power how attention allocated. Even letters have to compete with video and images. So the question is, how does brand consumption fit in to this kind of attention economy? 

Lanham states that if attention is the center of the economy, so is style as the devices that regulate attention are stylistic devices. Postmodern consumers has become obsessed with appearance, where style is a ready and heady substitute for identity, and presentation is viewed as having much more kudos than essence. Consumption/brands is used as means of appropriate and construct self-images that allow consumers to become more desirable and/or likeable in various social contexts. They can switch images and utilise consumption to liberate them from monotony and conformity.  

According to the postmodern manifesto, the meanings of objects are no longer fixed and linked to their functions, but are free-floating and individually defined. Thus, it’s the relationship that what matters to the consumers, not the actual object. Brand is a relationship that the consumer utilizes and modifies with one’s meanings, the product/service itself is secondary.
‘Never have there been so many neat cars out there, so much new and useful engineering, so many marvelous roads to drive them on….. Yet the felt center of the car business has gravitated to design and the brand recognition that design can create. […] And you don’t buy car anymore – you lease it like a piece of software that wears out its welcome in three years.’ (Lanham 2006) 
Style’s role in consumption also means that brands are more and more mediated through digital graphics. The real world becomes a printout through digital graphics and design, and we more and more live in synthetic reality from TV to games and university lectures (Lanham 2008). Style penetrates all, and thus we ought to ask what is the relation between style and substance within and cross different contexts.

Being individual together
There have been arguments that today’s culture of building highly individualized identities through consumption is alienating. This crisis is not new, though. Lanham notes that Western culture has been confronting a crisis of self-consciousness ever since the Renaissance which has only accelerated after Darwin and digital era. To come terms with self-consciousness is accepting the kind of being we are.  In this different identities and representations of self through consumption. Or letting go of the stigma of seeking individuality and consumption.

But rather than disappearing, the forms of socializing are reforming. Neo-tribes, networks of people gathering homogeneously together for social interaction, especially around consumption and brands are growing in the web. Spinning social bonds occur now on personal self-exhibition in front of other consumers through marks and rituals linked to brands. It seems that people do not want to build up their identities and representations of selves in isolation but with communities.

This need is essentially seeking for attention. Individuality calls for reactions. Lanham discusses Hawthorne Experiment as an example to demonstrate the efficiency behind attention: observation is the key. When you share ‘your thing’ with others, you socialize it. This way the individuality becomes more real, more interesting and worth to aspire. For example, in all sorts of performance programs at work places, more attention makes people work harder. Lanham calls this theatrical self-awareness. 

What else is blogging or participating in social media than attention - theatrical self-awareness? Observation, audience, reaction or whatever you want to name it, is the driving force behind the need to show individuality publicly. Building identity and representations of self can be seen as circle of attention, as consumers use these fleeting moments and manifest them to and with others.

Few words on Internet as Marketing Tool
The overall challenge is how to engage postmodern consumers individually and communally. Simmons states that marketers need to empower postmodern consumers to become marketers of their own self-images. Postmodernity calls for experience-based marketing. Marketing techniques need to allow consumers to construct for themselves different styles, forms and types of the same product, to utilize in their representations of different self-images in different situations. Internet enables this and the social aspect of it as Internet allows direct, real-time, individualized interaction with consumers on one-to-one, one-to-many or many-to-many basis to assure consumers’ objectives.

In user-controlled online environment, the brand proposition has to be highly compelling in order to initiate interaction. The idea that companies can utilize their brand websites to create consumer communities, is not dead yet even though entropy is taking over the social web, too.  Creating consumer community is far more complicated than providing a virtual platform as Simmons suggests.  Of course ideally, marketers would like to have all the information needed from one place, however nowadays web is so fragmented that a brand needs to be crossmedia and preferrably transmedia. Transmedia is the essentially providing these fleeting moments discussed above over and around a brand for people to build up their own collages.

Personally I don’t like the Internet as tool –thinking because it hinders realizing the goals of online or social media marketing. You can use marketing tools within the Web, but the Internet itself must be comprehended on a broader way than as a tool or technology. Internet is not separate reality; rather people are connected through it every day.

Even though the headline is outdated, Simmons touches many important issues yet to be explored: postmodern consumerism and experience-based marketing as discussed earlier but also collaborative customization. The Internet is really taking this to a new level as the voluntary front-end of RD  is getting bigger and bigger when enthusiasts and professionals combine their interests independently or with corporations.

Sources:
Lanham Richard A. (2006) The Economics of Attention: style and substance in the age of information. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Simmons, G. (2008). Marketing to postmodern consumers: introducing internet chameleon. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42 (3/4), pp. 299-310.